# Firebase vs Nhost

Source: https://listme.name/compare/firebase-vs-nhost
Framed by the ranking: https://listme.name/best/backend-as-a-service

| | Firebase | Nhost |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90.0 | 85.5 |
| Rank | #2 | #5 |
| Price | Free plan, paid upgrades | Free plan, paid upgrades |
| Best for | Mobile and web apps on Google's platform | Postgres and GraphQL apps with MIT-licensed code |
| Main focus | Google-hosted app services | Postgres, GraphQL and auth |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |

A mature app backend from Google with a no-cost Spark plan and a pay-as-you-go Blaze plan, plus up to $300 in credit for eligible customers. It is proprietary, and its costs spread across many line items. MIT-licensed Postgres backend with a GraphQL API and built-in authentication, a free Starter plan and a self-hosted option. It ranks just under Supabase here, and its Pro tier and compute are priced separately.