Comparison · App launchers
Alfred vs Raycast: which is better in 2026?
Raycast ranks higher in our list of app launchers (#1 against #2, score 92.0 against 90.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.
- 90.5Editorial score92.0
- 1Platforms2
- YesFree to useYes
- NoOpen sourceNo
Which should you choose?
Choose Alfred if you want
Mac users who want keyword workflows and fast app search.
A Mac launcher with hotkeys, keywords and text expansion, and an app search that learns which results you pick. Its workflows need the paid Powerpack, and it runs on macOS only.
Choose Raycast if you want
Mac and Windows users who want extensions and a free plan.
The most capable launcher here for people on both Mac and Windows, with an extension store and a free plan for personal and organizational use. AI and cloud sync sit behind the Pro plan.
The main differences
- Only Raycast runs on Windows.
Side by side
| Score | 90.5 | 92.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Rank in list | #2 of 10 | #1 of 10 |
| Price | Free plan, paid upgradesFree core app; Powerpack is a paid license for workflows | Free plan, paid upgradesFree for personal use; Pro adds AI, cloud sync and themes |
| Free to use | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOSmacOS | macOSWindowsmacOS, Windows |
| Made by | Not stated | Not stated |
| Best for | Mac users who want keyword workflows and fast app search | Mac and Windows users who want extensions and a free plan |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limits |
|
|
| Links | Visit site | Visit site |
Questions about Alfred vs Raycast
- Is Raycast better than Alfred?
- Raycast ranks higher in our list of app launchers (#1 against #2, score 92.0 against 90.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. Alfred is best for: Mac users who want keyword workflows and fast app search. Raycast is best for: Mac and Windows users who want extensions and a free plan.

