Comparison · API testing tools
Bruno vs Insomnia: which is better in 2026?
Bruno ranks higher in our list of API testing tools (#2 against #3, score 90.0 against 88.0), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.
- 90.0Editorial score88.0
- 4Platforms3
- YesFree to useYes
- YesOpen sourceYes
Which should you choose?
Choose Bruno if you want
Git-based API collections.
Free and MIT-licensed, with collections stored as Git-friendly files and no cloud sync needed. Team features need Pro at $6 per user a month, and it has fewer hosted collaboration features than Postman.
Choose Insomnia if you want
Commercial client with Git Sync.
A Kong-maintained client with a free local Scratch Pad, Git Sync for small teams and Apache-2.0 source. Team pricing is per user, with Pro at $12 and Enterprise at $45 per user a month.
Side by side
| Score | 90.0 | 88.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Rank in list | #2 of 10 | #3 of 10 |
| Price | Free plan, paid upgradesOpen Source plan free; Pro $6 and Ultimate $11 per user a month, billed annually | Free plan, paid upgradesFree Scratch Pad and Essentials; Pro $12 and Enterprise $45 per user a month |
| Free to use | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | WindowsmacOSLinuxCommand lineWindows, macOS, Linux, Command line | macOSWindowsLinuxmacOS, Windows, Linux |
| Made by | Not stated | Kong |
| Collections stored | Git-friendly files on disk | Local, with optional Git Sync or cloud |
| Best for | Git-based API collections | Commercial client with Git Sync |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limits |
|
|
| Links | Visit site | Visit site |

