Comparison · AI coding assistants

Cursor vs OpenCode: which is better in 2026?

Cursor ranks higher in our list of AI coding assistants (#2 against #4, score 92.0 against 87.5).

How we rank Share

  • 92.0
    Editorial score
    87.5
  • 3
    Platforms
    4
  • Yes
    Free to use
    Yes
  • No
    Open source
    Yes

Which should you choose?

Choose Cursor if you want

Developers who want an AI-first editor.

An AI-first editor with agents, cloud agents and team controls, and a free Hobby plan with limits. It is an editor you switch to, so teams that want to keep their current editor may prefer an extension.

Choose OpenCode if you want

Open-source terminal agent with any model provider.

MIT-licensed agent that runs in a terminal, an IDE or a desktop app, with free models included and any provider's models connectable. Its public repository and session features place it near Cline in this list.

The main differences

  • OpenCode is open source; Cursor is not.

Side by side

CursorOpenCode
Score92.087.5
Rank in list#2 of 10#4 of 10
PriceFree plan, paid upgradesFree Hobby plan with limits; Individual $20 a month; Teams $40 per user a monthFree and open sourceMIT-licensed and free to install; free models included, with separate Zen and Enterprise offerings
Free to useYesYes
Open sourceNoYes
PlatformsmacOSWindowsLinuxmacOS, Windows, LinuxWindowsmacOSLinuxCommand lineWindows, macOS, Linux, Command line
Made byNot statedAnomaly
InterfaceAI code editorTerminal, IDE and desktop app
Model choiceSeveral frontier modelsFree models or any provider
Commits to gitNot listedNot listed
Best forDevelopers who want an AI-first editorOpen-source terminal agent with any model provider
Strengths
  • Free Hobby plan without a credit card
  • Agents, cloud agents and MCP support on paid plans
  • Team billing, SSO and usage analytics on Teams
  • MIT-licensed with a large public repository
  • Works in the terminal, IDE and desktop app
  • Connects models from many providers
Limits
  • Hobby plan limits agent requests
  • Some features use usage-based billing
  • Results depend on the model connected
  • Hosted offerings are separate from the free software
LinksVisit site Visit site

Questions about Cursor vs OpenCode

Is Cursor better than OpenCode?
Cursor ranks higher in our list of AI coding assistants (#2 against #4, score 92.0 against 87.5). Cursor is best for: developers who want an AI-first editor. OpenCode is best for: open-source terminal agent with any model provider.
Which is cheaper, Cursor or OpenCode?
Cursor: Free Hobby plan with limits; Individual $20 a month; Teams $40 per user a month. OpenCode: MIT-licensed and free to install; free models included, with separate Zen and Enterprise offerings.
Do Cursor and OpenCode run on the same platforms?
Cursor supports macOS, Windows, Linux. OpenCode supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Command line.