Is SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture better than FUXA?

SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture ranks higher in our list of SCADA software (#2 against #4, score 90.5 against 86.5). FUXA is best for: free web dashboards and small SCADA projects. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture is best for: large Siemens-based plants with mixed OS servers.

Which is cheaper, FUXA or SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture?

FUXA: MIT-licensed and free; FUXA Pro is a one-time 100 euro license. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture: Licensed by server size and active connections; no prices on the product page.

Do FUXA and SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture run on the same platforms?

FUXA supports Web, Windows, macOS, Linux. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture supports Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.

FUXA vs SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture Compared (2026)

86.5
Editorial score
90.5
4
Platforms
4
Yes
Free to use
No
Yes
Open source
No

Which should you choose?

Choose FUXA if you want

Free web dashboards and small SCADA projects.

MIT-licensed and browser-based, with a wide protocol list and portable Windows, macOS and Linux builds. Pro features need the paid FUXA Pro edition, so production users should check which features they need.

Choose SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture if you want

Large Siemens-based plants with mixed OS servers.

Runs on Windows and Linux in one project, with redundant server setups and native iOS and Android clients. Licensing follows server size and connections, and the site shows no prices or trial.

The main differences

Only FUXA runs on macOS.
Only SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture runs on iOS.
Only SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture runs on Android.
Only FUXA runs on Web.
FUXA is open source; SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture is not.
FUXA can be used for free; SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture requires payment.

Side by side

	FUXA	SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture
Score	86.5	90.5
Rank in list	#4 of 8	#2 of 8
Price	Free and open sourceMIT-licensed and free; FUXA Pro is a one-time 100 euro license	Contact for pricingLicensed by server size and active connections; no prices on the product page
Free to use	Yes	No
Open source	Yes	No
Platforms	WebWindowsmacOSLinuxWeb, Windows, macOS, Linux	WindowsLinuxiOSAndroidWindows, Linux, iOS, Android
Made by	frangoteam	Siemens
License model	MIT; FUXA Pro one-time 100 euros	Server size and active connections
Web client	Yes	Yes
Protocols	Modbus, OPC UA, MQTT, Siemens S7	OPC UA, MQTT, IEC 104
Best for	Free web dashboards and small SCADA projects	Large Siemens-based plants with mixed OS servers
Strengths	Unlimited installations under the MIT license Browser-based editor for views and dashboards Wide protocol list including Modbus, S7 and OPC UA	Windows and Linux systems in one project Native iOS and Android clients Redundant high-end system design
Limits	Pro features need the paid FUXA Pro edition Documentation sits mainly in the repository and wiki	License terms depend on I/O and connection counts No prices or trial terms on the product page
Links	Visit site	Visit site

Questions about FUXA vs SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture

Is SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture better than FUXA?: SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture ranks higher in our list of SCADA software (#2 against #4, score 90.5 against 86.5). FUXA is best for: free web dashboards and small SCADA projects. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture is best for: large Siemens-based plants with mixed OS servers.
Which is cheaper, FUXA or SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture?: FUXA: MIT-licensed and free; FUXA Pro is a one-time 100 euro license. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture: Licensed by server size and active connections; no prices on the product page.
Do FUXA and SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture run on the same platforms?: FUXA supports Web, Windows, macOS, Linux. SIMATIC WinCC Open Architecture supports Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.