Comparison · AI agent frameworks and tooling

Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs LlamaIndex: which is better in 2026?

LlamaIndex ranks higher in our list of AI agent frameworks and tooling (#3 against #5, score 88.0 against 85.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.

How we rank Share

  • 85.5
    Editorial score
    88.0
  • 4
    Platforms
    1
  • Yes
    Free to use
    Yes
  • Yes
    Open source
    Yes

Which should you choose?

Choose Agent Development Kit (ADK) if you want

Agents built in code and deployed to Google Cloud.

Apache-2.0 code-first toolkit from Google with Python, TypeScript, Go and Java versions and a built-in web interface. Its deployment shortcuts point mainly to Google Cloud, so it fits teams already there.

Choose LlamaIndex if you want

Agents that work over documents and data.

The strongest focus on documents and retrieval, with an MIT-licensed framework and a separate parsing service. It is narrower for general agent work than LangChain.

The main differences

  • Only Agent Development Kit (ADK) runs on Linux.
  • Only Agent Development Kit (ADK) runs on Windows.
  • Only Agent Development Kit (ADK) runs on macOS.

Side by side

Agent Development Kit (ADK)LlamaIndex
Score85.588.0
Rank in list#5 of 12#3 of 12
PriceFree and open sourceApache-2.0 framework is free to use and self-hostFree and open sourceMIT-licensed framework is free; LlamaParse is a separate service
Free to useYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
PlatformsCommand lineWindowsmacOSLinuxCommand line, Windows, macOS, LinuxSelf-hostedSelf-hosted
Made byGoogleLlamaIndex
LanguagePython, TypeScript, Go and JavaNot listed
Agent approachCode-first agents with a web interfaceDocument-centric agents
Paid hosted serviceAgent Runtime on Google CloudLlamaParse, separate
Best forAgents built in code and deployed to Google CloudAgents that work over documents and data
Strengths
  • Apache-2.0 license with an active repository
  • Code-first agents with a built-in web interface
  • Same framework in Python, TypeScript, Go and Java
  • MIT licensed with source on GitHub
  • Focus on document and data workflows
  • Separate parsing service available
Limits
  • Deployment shortcuts point mainly to Google Cloud
  • Hosted model access is billed by the provider
  • Parsing service is a separate product to evaluate
  • Narrower agent focus than general orchestration frameworks
LinksVisit site Visit site

Questions about Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs LlamaIndex

Is LlamaIndex better than Agent Development Kit (ADK)?
LlamaIndex ranks higher in our list of AI agent frameworks and tooling (#3 against #5, score 88.0 against 85.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. Agent Development Kit (ADK) is best for: agents built in code and deployed to Google Cloud. LlamaIndex is best for: agents that work over documents and data.
Which is cheaper, Agent Development Kit (ADK) or LlamaIndex?
Agent Development Kit (ADK): Apache-2.0 framework is free to use and self-host. LlamaIndex: MIT-licensed framework is free; LlamaParse is a separate service.
Do Agent Development Kit (ADK) and LlamaIndex run on the same platforms?
Agent Development Kit (ADK) supports Command line, Windows, macOS, Linux. LlamaIndex supports Self-hosted.