Comparison · Screenshot tools
Greenshot vs Xnapper: which is better in 2026?
Greenshot ranks higher in our list of screenshot tools (#5 against #6, score 85.0 against 84.0), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.
- 85.0Editorial score84.0
- 1Platforms1
- YesFree to useYes
- YesOpen sourceNo
Which should you choose?
Choose Greenshot if you want
Small free capture tool on Windows.
A light-weight, free, open-source screenshot tool for Windows under GPL-3.0. Its Mac version is a separate App Store product under a proprietary license, and it does not cover Linux.
Choose Xnapper if you want
Mac users who share styled screenshots.
A Mac screenshot app that styles captures for sharing, with a free download and one-time paid licences that remove the watermark. It runs on macOS only, so it covers one system.
The main differences
- Only Greenshot runs on Windows.
- Only Xnapper runs on macOS.
- Greenshot is open source; Xnapper is not.
Side by side
| Score | 85.0 | 84.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Rank in list | #5 of 10 | #6 of 10 |
| Price | Free and open sourceFree and open source under GPL-3.0; Mac version is separate | Free plan, paid upgradesFree download; one-time paid licences remove the watermark |
| Free to use | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Platforms | WindowsWindows | macOSmacOS |
| Made by | Not stated | Not stated |
| Best for | Small free capture tool on Windows | Mac users who share styled screenshots |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limits |
|
|
| Links | Visit site | Visit site |
Questions about Greenshot vs Xnapper
- Is Greenshot better than Xnapper?
- Greenshot ranks higher in our list of screenshot tools (#5 against #6, score 85.0 against 84.0), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. Greenshot is best for: small free capture tool on Windows. Xnapper is best for: Mac users who share styled screenshots.

