Comparison · OEE and production monitoring software

ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring vs Tulip: which is better in 2026?

ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring ranks higher in our list of OEE and production monitoring software (#4 against #6, score 84.5 against 82.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.

How we rank Share

  • 84.5
    Editorial score
    82.5
  • 1
    Platforms
    1
  • No
    Free to use
    No
  • No
    Open source
    No

Which should you choose?

Choose ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring if you want

Kepware-connected plants on the ThingWorx stack.

Prebuilt OEE, MTBF and MTTR dashboards that depend on Kepware for machine data. Pricing is quote-based, and the product page does not describe ERP connections.

Choose Tulip if you want

OEE with operator reason codes and custom apps.

Automatic OEE from machine states, with operators adding downtime reason codes over OPC UA or MQTT. It is a broader frontline platform than a single OEE tool, and pricing is per monthly active interface.

The main differences

  • ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring is contact for pricing; Tulip is subscription.

Side by side

ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance MonitoringTulip
Score84.582.5
Rank in list#4 of 10#6 of 10
PriceContact for pricingQuote-based; no prices on the product pageSubscriptionPer monthly active interface, billed annually; contact for enterprise plans
Free to useNoNo
Open sourceNoNo
PlatformsWebWebWebWeb
Made byVeloticNot stated
Machine dataKepware connectivityOPC UA, MQTT or edge hardware
ERP integrationNot stated on the product pagePre-built ERP connectors
SetupQuote-based deploymentBuild apps on the platform
Best forKepware-connected plants on the ThingWorx stackOEE with operator reason codes and custom apps
Strengths
  • Prebuilt OEE, MTBF and MTTR dashboards
  • Downtime and waste capture
  • Published OEE customer story
  • Downtime reason codes entered by operators
  • OPC UA and MQTT connections are native
  • Pre-built connectors for ERP and machines
Limits
  • Works best alongside Kepware connectivity
  • No prices on the product page
  • Broader platform than a single-purpose OEE tool
  • Plans depend on monthly active interface counts
LinksVisit site Visit site

Questions about ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring vs Tulip

Is ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring better than Tulip?
ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring ranks higher in our list of OEE and production monitoring software (#4 against #6, score 84.5 against 82.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring is best for: kepware-connected plants on the ThingWorx stack. Tulip is best for: OEE with operator reason codes and custom apps.
Which is cheaper, ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring or Tulip?
ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring: Quote-based; no prices on the product page. Tulip: Per monthly active interface, billed annually; contact for enterprise plans.
Do ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring and Tulip run on the same platforms?
ThingWorx Real-time Production Performance Monitoring supports Web. Tulip supports Web.