Sign in

Browse by category

More

Comparison · Applicant tracking systems

Ashby vs Workable: which is better in 2026?

Ashby92.5#2 in best applicant tracking systemsWorkable91.5#3 in best applicant tracking systems

Ashby ranks higher in our list of applicant tracking systems (#2 against #3, score 92.5 against 91.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.

How we rank Share

  • 92.5
    Editorial score
    91.5
  • 1
    Platforms
    1
  • No
    Free to use
    No
  • No
    Open source
    No

Which should you choose?

Choose Ashby if you want

One system for sourcing, scheduling and analytics.

The broadest single product here: applicant tracking, candidate CRM, scheduling, offers and analytics in one system. Only the smallest plan is priced publicly, so larger teams need a sales conversation.

Choose Workable if you want

Recruiting and HR in one system with published prices.

Broad coverage from job posting to onboarding, a free trial without a card, and published monthly bundles. Its AI agent is billed on credits, and recruiting comes bundled with HR, so a recruiting-only team pays for more than it needs.

Side by side

AshbyWorkable
Score92.591.5
Rank in list#2 of 10#3 of 10
PriceSubscriptionFoundations plan listed at $400 a month up to 100 employees; larger plans by quoteSubscriptionMonthly bundles of recruiting and HR, free trial; Standard $299 a month
Free to useNoNo
Open sourceNoNo
PlatformsWebWebWebWeb
Made byNot statedNot stated
Company size served1 to 1,000+ employees1 to 1,000+ employees
AI featuresAI in each product layerWorkable Agent sources and screens
HostingVendor-hosted (SaaS)Vendor-hosted (SaaS)
Best forOne system for sourcing, scheduling and analyticsRecruiting and HR in one system with published prices
Strengths
  • ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one product
  • Multi-stage candidate sequences across email and LinkedIn
  • Analytics product that works with an existing ATS
  • Posts to more than 200 job boards
  • Recruiting and HR in one system
  • Free trial with no credit card required
Limits
  • Larger plans are not priced publicly
  • Broader scope than a basic applicant tracker
  • Recruiting and HR come bundled in each price
  • The AI agent is billed through AI credits
LinksVisit site Visit site

Questions about Ashby vs Workable

Is Ashby better than Workable?
Ashby ranks higher in our list of applicant tracking systems (#2 against #3, score 92.5 against 91.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. Ashby is best for: one system for sourcing, scheduling and analytics. Workable is best for: recruiting and HR in one system with published prices.
Which is cheaper, Ashby or Workable?
Ashby: Foundations plan listed at $400 a month up to 100 employees; larger plans by quote. Workable: Monthly bundles of recruiting and HR, free trial; Standard $299 a month.
Do Ashby and Workable run on the same platforms?
Ashby supports Web. Workable supports Web.

Choosing between the two

Learning Center
1:17Beginner · 4 min readHow to decide between two good optionsSettle a close call by sorting it by how hard it is to undo, setting a deadline, scoring the criteria as a tie-breaker and writing down why you chose.1:20Beginner · 6 min readHow to compare products fairly: what to keep in mindDefine the job, cap the must-haves, compare like with like, count total cost over one period and weigh the criteria. Includes a worked example.

Read more about Ashby and Workable

All articles