Comparison · Applicant tracking systems
Greenhouse vs Workable: which is better in 2026?
Greenhouse93.5#1 in best applicant tracking systems
Workable91.5#3 in best applicant tracking systemsGreenhouse ranks higher in our list of applicant tracking systems (#1 against #3, score 93.5 against 91.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need.
- 93.5Editorial score91.5
- 1Platforms1
- NoFree to useNo
- NoOpen sourceNo
Which should you choose?
Choose Greenhouse if you want
Structured hiring for mid-size and enterprise teams.
Structured interviewing and talent matching sit in one platform, and it has the most formal process in this list. Prices need a demo, and setup is heavier than in the lighter trackers here.
Choose Workable if you want
Recruiting and HR in one system with published prices.
Broad coverage from job posting to onboarding, a free trial without a card, and published monthly bundles. Its AI agent is billed on credits, and recruiting comes bundled with HR, so a recruiting-only team pays for more than it needs.
The main differences
- Greenhouse is contact for pricing; Workable is subscription.
Side by side
| Greenhouse | Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93.5 | 91.5 |
| Rank in list | #1 of 10 | #3 of 10 |
| Price | Contact for pricingCore, Plus and Pro plans; cost depends on plan and hiring volume | SubscriptionMonthly bundles of recruiting and HR, free trial; Standard $299 a month |
| Free to use | No | No |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | WebWeb | WebWeb |
| Made by | Greenhouse Software, Inc. | Not stated |
| Company size served | Early-stage to enterprise | 1 to 1,000+ employees |
| AI features | Voice AI and talent matching | Workable Agent sources and screens |
| Hosting | Vendor-hosted (SaaS) | Vendor-hosted (SaaS) |
| Best for | Structured hiring for mid-size and enterprise teams | Recruiting and HR in one system with published prices |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Limits |
|
|
| Links | Visit site | Visit site |
Questions about Greenhouse vs Workable
- Is Greenhouse better than Workable?
- Greenhouse ranks higher in our list of applicant tracking systems (#1 against #3, score 93.5 against 91.5), but the gap is small and the better choice depends on what you need. Greenhouse is best for: structured hiring for mid-size and enterprise teams. Workable is best for: recruiting and HR in one system with published prices.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Workable?
- Greenhouse: Core, Plus and Pro plans; cost depends on plan and hiring volume. Workable: Monthly bundles of recruiting and HR, free trial; Standard $299 a month.
- Do Greenhouse and Workable run on the same platforms?
- Greenhouse supports Web. Workable supports Web.
Choosing between the two
Learning Center
1:17How to decide between two good optionsSettle a close call by sorting it by how hard it is to undo, setting a deadline, scoring the criteria as a tie-breaker and writing down why you chose.
1:20How to compare products fairly: what to keep in mindDefine the job, cap the must-haves, compare like with like, count total cost over one period and weigh the criteria. Includes a worked example.
